Bookmark and Share

FOR Logo Friends of the River
 The voice of California's rivers
Friends of the River

RA masthead

email2 Tell A Friend

feather river painting smallFine Art Fundraiser for FOR in Sacramento – November 6th 5:30 to 7 pm 
A fine art fundraiser for Friends of the River featuring outdoor and river-themed works by artists from the Sacramento area will be held on Wednesday, November 6, 2013 at The Art Studios behind Michelangelo's Restaurant (1725 I Street). Admission is free and the fun starts at 5:30pm and runs until 7pm. Works river shadows smallfrom over xx artists will be on display and light refreshments will be served. Bring your checkbook - Fifty percent (50%) of any work sold that evening will be donated to Friends of the River! For more information contact us at  

92713 amr cleanup1 Mile of River + 30 Volunteers = 1200 pounds of trash removed!
Friends of the River would like to thank the 30 volunteers who helped us clean up Sutter's Landing Park along the American River this Saturday. We picked up about 1,200 pounds of trash, 120 pounds of recycling, two old mattresses, a broken bike and a broken bike rack, one tire, one seat cushion and hundreds of cigarette butts. A special thanks to the ten or so members of the Unitarian Universalist Church who showed up in their Love t-shirts.

sacramento river 92713Shasta Dam Raise Threatens Sacramento River Ecosystems
By Steve Evans
Monday, September 30 is the deadline to comment on the Bureau of Reclamation’s proposed raising of Shasta Dam. While Friends of the River’s previous alerts have largely focused on the proposed dam raise and its impacts on the upper Sacramento and McCloud Rivers (two streams eligible for National Wild & Scenic River protection), new information has been revealed about how the dam raise will adversely affect the Sacramento River downstream of the dam.
If you haven’t already emailed your comments to the Bureau of Reclamation about this environmentally destructive and unwise project, please do so TODAY by visiting
The CALFED Ecosystem Restoration Program published in 2008 the final Sacramento River Ecological Flows (SREF) Study, which raises a number of significant and troubling issues about the modification of flows in the Sacramento River that would be caused by raising Shasta Dam. Ironically, several agencies within the joint state/federal agency consortium known as CALFED have been pushing for the proposed dam raise while other CALFED agencies have been studying the likely adverse impacts of the raise on the Sacramento River and its many sensitive, threatened, and endangered fish and wildlife species.
The proposed raise of Shasta Dam would capture more run-off during the winter and spring months and further modify the river’s flow regime. The SREF Study noted that dam-related alterations of river flow regimes are one of the three leading causes of declines in imperiled aquatic ecosystems. The Study specifically found that the proposed dam raise will reduce the “stream power” of the Sacramento River by 16% and reduce the amount of floodplain reworked by high flows by 8%.
Although these numbers may seem minor, the power of the river to erode stream banks is essential for the re-creation of new riparian forest habitat and to produce spawning gravels for fish, including endangered salmon. In addition, flood plains have been found to play an important role in the survival and healthy growth of young salmon as they migrate downstream to the ocean. Any reduction in stream power and less frequent inundation of adjacent flood plains is bound to have significant impacts on fisheries, aquatic ecosystems, and riparian forests.
In regard to the Sacramento River and the existing Shasta Dam, the SREF Study stated that available data “supports the hypothesis” that the reduced frequency and duration of floodplain inundation caused by Shasta Dam “may have contributed to the decline of the winter-run Chinook (salmon) population.” More than 50,000 winter-run Chinook formerly migrated up the Sacramento River every year to spawn in the early 1970s but the run declined to only 1,533 individual fish by 2010. Impacts on salmon spawning in the Sacramento River was confirmed in the SREF Study, which states “Reductions in peak flow magnitude will likely reduce bank erosion and thus have potential impacts on spawning gravel availability…”
The current dam’s alteration of existing flows also appears to limit cottonwood seedling survival, which is the first step towards the regeneration of new riparian forest habitat along the Sacramento River.  The SREF Study confirmed that reduced flows will limit bank erosion, which is critical for “Maintaining natural channel migration and cutoff processes," both of which are “necessary for providing new patches for seedling recruitment and for periodical resetting of riparian vegetation succession.” The SREF Study noted that these processes are “critical for maintaining the diverse, dynamic, and functional riparian-floodplain ecosystem” of the river and “essential for creating off-channel habitats important to many Sacramento River species.”
The SREF Study documents a troubling threat to the flow regime required to maintain the aquatic and riparian ecosystems that make up the Sacramento River National Wildlife Refuge. The Refuge consists of 29 properties along a 77-mile segment of the Sacramento River between Red Bluff and Colusa, totaling approximately 10,146 acres of public land. The Refuge was established in 1989 and has been periodically expanded ever since to protect the river’s riparian habitat and native fish and wildlife species. Approximately 95% of the former riparian habitat along the Sacramento River was lost to firewood cutting and agricultural conversions. The purpose of the Refuge is to protect the remaining habitat and facilitate the restoration of new habitat.
The SREF Study also raises questions about impacts on federal lands along the Sacramento River upstream of Red Bluff managed for outdoor recreation and wildlife habitat by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). BLM manages a 20-mile segment of nearly continuous public land between Balls Ferry Road and Red Bluff, known as the Sacramento River Bend Area. The 17,000 acres of public land that encompass this area have been proposed for designation by members of Congress as a National Recreation Area. In addition, the BLM in 1993 determined this segment of the Sacramento River to be eligible for National Wild & Scenic River protection due to its outstanding salmon and steelhead fishery and riparian forest habitat. The SREF Study’s findings about the impacts of flow modification due to the dam raise are pertinent to this river segment.
In the Shasta Dam Raise environmental impact statement, the Bureau of Reclamation claims that it will mitigate the “potentially significant” flow-modification impacts to the Sacramento River downstream of Shasta Dam to “less than significant” levels by developing and implementing an Adaptive Management Plan. This as yet unwritten plan will theoretically provide flow releases to benefit and restore Sacramento River riparian habitat and fisheries downstream of the dam. But the history of Bureau operations in the Central Valley is replete with broken promises and salmon declining towards extinction.

Ron StorkRiver Currents
Ron Stork
Merced River Notebook
River Ambassadorship
It's sometimes difficult for Friends of the River members to appreciate that many of California's scenic rivers are little known to most Californians. That even includes world-famous rivers such as the Yosemite's Merced River, which then travels more than twenty-five miles through a spectacular V-shaped canyon between two national forests and through the Bureau of Land Management country before disappearing under thirty-two miles of Merced Irrigation District and PG&E reservoirs.
Words don't describe these rivers and river places well. They have to be experienced. They have to be seen. To do our part, we've gathered some images on Friends of the River's Flicker pages. Take a look at them. Offer some yourself. We've got room.
Happily, Yosemite area photographer Mike Osborn has really taken up this challenge with a stunning 79-page book featuring the wild and not-so-wild Merced, focusing on the canyon below Yosemite National Park. Not only are the images beautiful, the book takes aim at the disrespect that the canyon has suffered from its Congressional representatives who are pushing for a part of it to be removed from the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System.
Called "Deemed Unscenic," the title is borrowed from the name of a local El Portal garage band that was disturbed that their home reach of the Merced wild & scenic river just below the Park was not considered outstandingly scenic by wild & scenic river managing agencies.
I think that Mike's book demonstrates otherwise. Buy it. Share it with friends, colleagues, and others who can help to remind our fellow countrymen that our National Wild & Scenic Rivers deserve respect---and even some well-deserved awe.
Check it out at  and search for mike osborne. It's available in a wirebound book or electronically.
Congressional Report
Speaking of disrespect, Representative Tom McClintock's (R-Elk Grove) bill, HR 934, to de-designate enough of the Merced Wild & Scenic River to allow the Merced Irrigation District to drown a little more of the Merced under its reservoirs is still awaiting floor time in the House of Representatives. It could move at any time. And last year, the House passed a similar bill sponsored by Rep. Jeff Denham (R-Modesto). The odds are good it will pass again.
Fortunately, last year the Senate failed to take up the House bill. This year, there's new leadership in the Senate Energy Committee (Senator Ron Wyden-Oregon) and from House Natural Resources Committee Democrats (Rep. Peter DeFazio-Eugene Oregon). To a large extent, the fate of this piece of the Merced River, and of the National Wild & Scenic Rivers System generally, is in their hands, the senators from California, and the President's. And, of course, in a democracy, ultimately in all of our hands.
Check out our Merced River pages on our website for more information.
In the meantime, a nice win.
Geologists like to remind us that we live at the mercy of this planet's geology. Certainly CalTrans received a reminder when 798,000 tons of canyonside broke free and landed on Highway 140 in 2006.
A couple of temporary bridges were thrown across the river, but it's taken CalTrans years to learn that highways along national wild & scenic rivers deserve respect too---as well as wild & scenic river managers.
So I was pleased when a compact disk arrived with a couple of new CalTrans proposals for the permanent reconstruction of the Yosemite highway. This time, CalTrans proposed to burrow under the slide or canyon rock alongside the slide instead of proposing giant freeway-type bridges along and above the river itself. CalTrans had learned that the Merced River canyon was not L.A. That was good.
It was not a surprise. Friends of the River and Defenders of Wildlife had spent some time working in the California legislature to help make it possible for Cal Trans to choose these alternatives. We were happy to do it.
[End of Merced noodles]
And on another front.
As the Brown Administration grinds its way forward on making it easier to ship water from the north state to the south state, more and more north-state water interests are showing concern. That's a good thing.
Water shipped south will not generally be available in the north for either the north's iconic fisheries or for use by farms and suburbs in the Sacramento Valley. In spite of being told for many decades that only "surplus" water will be sold to the south state, northern California water agencies are growing alarmed that the legal framework and other institutions they had hoped to rely upon (California's area of origin/watershed protection statutes and the goodwill of the export-project managers) don't fulfill those roles well.
In some cases the alarm is because Sacramento Valley water suppliers have recently lost court decisions that have narrowed or eliminated the priority that "area of origin" water agencies believed they had; in other cases it's because modeling by the state and federal water-exporting agencies show an empty-reservoir future more and more for the north state. In part that's because the entitlements for cheap water exceed the supply of water; in part it's because when it's easier to move water through (or under) the Delta, more water goes south.
So in recent months, Sacramento-area urban water suppliers, including Sacramento's basketball-star mayor, have found their voice and are raising objections to the plans of the Brown Administration. It's understandable that they are. Whether it will make a difference is unclear. As the south-state interests have pointed out, there's not going to be a vote this time. If the exporters can agree among themselves on how to finance the big tunnels, they won't need anyone's permission.
I guess we'll just have to see how well that will work out for them.
In the meantime, the big 11-billion dollar water bond with 4.8 billion dollars of dam-construction money and a lot of funding for the Delta restoration projects is still scheduled for the November 2014 statewide ballot. Friends of the River opposed the water bond before, and with a two-thirds vote requirement in the legislature to change it, it hasn’t changed yet.

McCloud above Shasta Aug 2013Book Review by Steve Evans
The Sacramento. A Transcendent River
By Bob Madgic
Published by River Bend Books, Anderson, CA
224 pages, Retail Price: $40 for hardbook, $24.95 for paperback; both are 8 ½” x 11”. (prices do not include shipping or sales tax)
Bob Madgic’s labor of love, The Sacramento. A Transcendent River, is the most comprehensive and welcoming book about California’s largest and most important river to date. Available in both hardback and paperback, it is chock full of beautiful photographs, compelling stories, and useful information about the Sacramento River, from its source near Mount Shasta to the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta.
In an easy to read natural story-telling style, Madgic catalogues the outstanding natural values of this mighty river and its salmon runs, once vast riparian forests, and waterfowl. He recounts the river’s human history, from the Native American tribes who lived along its banks, to Jedediah Smith and other early European explorers, to when the river became a pathway for steamboats and the railroad servicing small rural farm communities along the way.
Madgic recounts how severe floods in the Sacramento Valley created the push to control the river with levees and ultimately, the construction of the Shasta Dam, just north of Redding. One of the highest dams in the state, Shasta and its reservoir control floods and supply large quantities of water to irrigate vast farmlands in the southern Central Valley—the dam’s primary purpose in initiating the federal Central Valley Project—and drinking water to many California cities.
But the book is uncompromising in its assessment of how Shasta Dam (and the other dams, pumps, and canals that comprise the state and federal water projects) transformed the river and the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. The dam permanently flooded the homeland and waters of the Winnemen Wintu Indians and precipitated the decline of the river’s once bountiful salmon fishery, as well contributing to the near collapse of the delta ecosystem.
Sacramento RiverThe Sacramento. A Transcendent River recounts the ongoing efforts of regulatory agencies, conservation groups, and sports persons to protect and restore the river (including, in the interest of full disclosure, a certain Steve Evans from Friends of the River). Madgic also shares with the reader the recreational delights of the river and its many offerings to anglers, hunters, boaters, tubers, hikers, and wildlife viewers. The book closes with how the river plays an important role today as an outdoor classroom for the next generation of river conservationists.
This is a particularly important book to read now, as the Bureau of Reclamation is asking the public of what they think about raising Shasta Dam by more than 18 feet and enlarging what is already the largest reservoir in the state. Friends of the River and other conservationists are concerned the dam raise will flood important upstream segments of the upper Sacramento and McCloud Rivers, destroy Native American cultural sites, and modify downstream flows to the detriment of the river’s riparian and aquatic ecosystems and the many sensitive, threatened, and endangered fish and wildlife species that depend on these ecosystems.
Madgic appropriately concludes his book by noting that the Sacramento River “has an unlimited ability to restore and sustain itself.  It really comes down to whether people possess the will to abide by Aldo Leopold’s proposed land ethic where land and organisms are treated as a community and humans act to to preserve its integrity, stability, and beauty…”
The main message of this book, conveyed in both text and over 190 photos, is the power and beauty of a natural river. As such, it belongs in the library of every individual who not only loves rivers but who wishes to do his or her part in preserving them.
The Sacramento. A Transcendent River and other books by Bob Madgic are available to order at . The author has generously offered to donate 20% to Friends of the River from sales of A Transcendent River to FOR members. Please note your FOR membership in your order.
September 27, 2013
Volume 3, Number 9
The Voice of California's Rivers
Since 1973
In this issue

Art Fundraiser for FOR in Sacramento - Nov 6
Volunteers Help Clean-up the American with FOR
Shasta Dam Raise Threatens Sacramento River
River Currents by Ron Stork

Book Review by Steve Evans: The Sacramento. A Transcendent River by Bob Madgic 

CRA 2013 Homepge

join/donate FOR button
The River Advocate is published by Friends of the River contact us at

Home | Tell A Friend | Unsubscribe
Friends Of The River, 1418 20th St., Suite 100, Sacramento CA 95811
888.464.2477Powered by Convio

Take Action Red White Button


 join/donate FOR button

Earth Share Logo.

Questions or comments: